Engine repair service near Pikesville, MD

Charlie and Ray's Auto Repair has been in business since 1993 serving the Essex, Dundalk, Middle River and surrounding communities. In fact, we have customers that come from many miles away to have us service and repair their vehicles. We can service all makes and models of passenger vehicles and light trucks. If you have a fleet, we can handle that too. We have a number of commercial customers that trust their pm and repair programs to Charlie & Ray's. We specialize in electrical repairs as well as engine and transmission replacement. We are a partner dealer for Jasper products. We strive to exceed customer expectations on each and every visit to our shop. Please stop by and see us today!

Was able to get in same day. Very friendly staff. Went to Ranglin’s after calling around and being told I would have to wait at least a week to get my car in. Got a appointment next day and was able to get I pick up car using there after hours lock box. Also price was very reasonable. Will definitely be coming back for my future car service needs.

The folks at API are very in tune to the latest technologies and electronics available in today's vehicle industry.I have never been disappointed in any work completed on my vehicle at API Service. The staff is very personable and the owner, Bobby Poist, take ownership in every vehicle that is serviced at API Service. Two thumbs up and A++++++++++++ to this business.

these guy are great

This review is specific to the Tune and Lube on Windsor Mill Road. In July 2010, they replaced my lower ball joint, and other related parts, at the cost of $550. January 2011, I noticed a noise coming from the front end, and returned to Tune for a diagnosis. Fortunately, the owner failed to remember me. The diagnosis was a problem with the same ball joint that was replaced in July. Once I reminded the owner of his work only 6 months earlier, and produced a receipt, he appeared stupefied. His proposal: Maybe he could "cut a deal on the part" (the part's cost was $67). Essentially, he proposed that I pay again for the same work performed 6 months earlier. To explain his decision, he cited legalities such as his 90-day warranty. Dismissed was the basic premise of customer service, which would impel a conscientious businessperson to correct work that was obviously faulty in some manner. He actuallly expected me to pay again for the same work he was responsible for completing just 6 months earlier.